Insight by Psychology
We downplay luck's role in our success because fortunate events are external and unearned, so they don't register as things we did and therefore get omitted from our explanations for outcomes.
Every card on Korva is an insight someone saved from a podcast or video they loved.
More from @psychology's Picks
See all →Your capacity for wholeheartedness is limited by how much heartbreak you're willing to endure, because wholehearted engagement requires vulnerability that exposes you to loss and pain.
Admitting luck in your success increases perceived kindness because acknowledging external help signals humility and social awareness, which makes observers view you as more likable and trustworthy.
People put on psychological armor—perfectionism, intellectualizing, control—to avoid judgment, but because that armor hides vulnerability it also blocks access to love and belonging and increases suffering.
World-record performances often need favorable external conditions because transient boosts like tailwinds add performance margin that, combined with top-level ability, enable records that ability alone might not reach.
Authentic influencer endorsements inform because they reflect real experience and align with users' needs, while counterfeit endorsements (fake scarcity or cherry-picked claims) exploit heuristics and erode trust.
Successful people often believe the world is meritocratic because survivor bias leads them to observe only those who worked hard and succeeded, causing them to generalize that effort reliably produces success while ignoring failed but hardworking peers.
Basic ingroup–outgroup loyalties create social distance from outsiders, which reduces empathy and makes harmful treatment of outgroups psychologically permissible.
A practical strategy is to act as if you control your destiny to sustain effort, but also acknowledge luck and use any fortune to help others because belief in control drives persistence while admitting chance prevents overconfidence and promotes redistribution.